- Class 1a
- Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.1a A sasquatch/bigfoot specimen has been collected (alive or dead).
- Class 1b
- Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.1b A report investigation results in a sasquatch observation or the documentation of clear tracks or other forms of physical evidence by an investigator.
- Class 1c
- Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.1c An investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot by a very reliable observer is a distinct possibility, tangible corroborating evidence is documented, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
- Class 1d
- Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.1d A visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility involving two or more reliable observers, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
- Class 2
- Class 2, Competency: Reports involving sightings by professionally trained or highly skilled observers.2 Investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility, the observer is exceptionally trustworthy, professionally trained, and experienced in the outdoors and/or is accustomed to looking for and recording details (e.g., biologist, anthropologist/archaeologist, ranger, trapper/tracker/seasoned hunter, bird watcher, game warden, naturalist, law enforcement), and other explanations can be reasonably excluded.
- Class 3a
- Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.3a Investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility, the observer is credible, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
- Class 3b
- Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.3b Unidentifiable vocalizations were reported and there is accompanying tangible evidence to possibly indicate the presence of a sasquatch/bigfoot, the observer is very reliable, and other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
- Class 3c
- Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.3c No visual encounter occurred, but physical evidence was found to indicate the presence of a sasquatch/bigfoot (tracks, hair, scat, etc.), the observer is very reliable, and other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Case: 01140024
Class 3aHog Hunter Has Morning Sighting of Bipedal Creature
Report Details
Occurrence date: July/2014
Location: Montgomery County, TX
Nearby/Vicinity: Montgomery
Time / Conditions: 09:00 — Sunny and around 90 degrees.
# of Witnesses: 1
Location: Montgomery County, TX
Nearby/Vicinity: Montgomery
Time / Conditions: 09:00 — Sunny and around 90 degrees.
# of Witnesses: 1
Witness Account:
At 0850 in the sam Houston national forest I had entered one of the compartments on Osborne road to hunt hog, when I heard a loud cracking of tree limbs, at which point I started to film and scan the tree line. Upon observing the video later many of my friends and family and I noticed a black two legged creature running off about 100 yards away or so. Later that day I switched hunting spots to the pipeline off 1375 just west of Lake Conroe. Waking into the brush I again heard tree limbs cracking and found several footprints with visible toes and weight distribution., as if the animal had shifted weight to the big toe or tip toed along game trails. I noticed and photographed 3 different sized tracks that looked very human or ape-like.
Hand/foot prints:
One of the prints was medium sized (similar to a size 12 shoe or so) this was the clearest "bigfoot-like" print I found.
Sounds:
Tree limbs cracking and possible chatter.
Additional observations:
NA
