Class 3a Encounter Report in Hemphill, TX, Case #01130003

close

Class 1a
Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.
1a A sasquatch/bigfoot specimen has been collected (alive or dead).
Class 1b
Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.
1b A report investigation results in a sasquatch observation or the documentation of clear tracks or other forms of physical evidence by an investigator.
Class 1c
Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.
1c An investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot by a very reliable observer is a distinct possibility, tangible corroborating evidence is documented, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Class 1d
Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.
1d A visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility involving two or more reliable observers, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Class 2
Class 2, Competency: Reports involving sightings by professionally trained or highly skilled observers.
2 Investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility, the observer is exceptionally trustworthy, professionally trained, and experienced in the outdoors and/or is accustomed to looking for and recording details (e.g., biologist, anthropologist/archaeologist, ranger, trapper/tracker/seasoned hunter, bird watcher, game warden, naturalist, law enforcement), and other explanations can be reasonably excluded.
Class 3a
Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.
3a Investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility, the observer is credible, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Class 3b
Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.
3b Unidentifiable vocalizations were reported and there is accompanying tangible evidence to possibly indicate the presence of a sasquatch/bigfoot, the observer is very reliable, and other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Class 3c
Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.
3c No visual encounter occurred, but physical evidence was found to indicate the presence of a sasquatch/bigfoot (tracks, hair, scat, etc.), the observer is very reliable, and other sources can be reasonably ruled out.


Case: 01130003

Class 3a

Fishermen Have Brief Sighting and Hear Unusual Vocalization

Report Details

Occurrence date: June/2011
Location: Sabine County, TX
Nearby/Vicinity: Hemphill
Time / Conditions: 11:00 — Partly cloudy and hot
# of Witnesses: 2

Witness Account:
I was fishing with my dad at six mile creek on Toledo Bend. The lake was low that summer, so the creek was about all you could follow. We had made our way back in the creek with the troll motor. The grass around the creek was prob 4 ft high so we could not see on either side. We approached a little arm that was feeding the creek and passed it up. We prob went another 30 yards and turned around it was getting a little narrow for both of us to throw. As we approached the the arm on the return we both heard an loud human voice say YAK. My dad ask me what the hell was that. We had only seen one other boat back there and they were leaving out prob an hour to hour and a half before us. As soon as we heard the voice I witnessed a coyote running off with a duck. He disappeared in the tall grass and out of the corner of my eye running up the hill was a figure on two legs running to a group of pines as the figure got to the second are third pine it stepped behind the pine and stuck its head out and looked at us. I did not see a snout like a deer or dog it had a flat face it was brown in color and as it was running you could see the features of a very closely resembling human butt. We were prob 150 yds maybe. It happened really fast. We did not go up the arm to investigate because the arm was too shallow. It really spooked us both us. We did go back a few times but nothing happened.

Physical evidence:
The voice we heard that said yak sounded kinda ticked off. We have talked about the incident a few times and the only conclusion we came to is the creature we saw was mad because the coyote got to the duck before it did then it seen us come back in sight of creek arm and that's when it ran.


Map

Left Menu Iconmenu
WoodApe.org
Right Menu Icon