- Class 1a
- Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.1a A sasquatch/bigfoot specimen has been collected (alive or dead).
- Class 1b
- Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.1b A report investigation results in a sasquatch observation or the documentation of clear tracks or other forms of physical evidence by an investigator.
- Class 1c
- Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.1c An investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot by a very reliable observer is a distinct possibility, tangible corroborating evidence is documented, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
- Class 1d
- Class 1, Corroboration: Reports involving a sighting, and accompanied by another form of support.1d A visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility involving two or more reliable observers, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
- Class 2
- Class 2, Competency: Reports involving sightings by professionally trained or highly skilled observers.2 Investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility, the observer is exceptionally trustworthy, professionally trained, and experienced in the outdoors and/or is accustomed to looking for and recording details (e.g., biologist, anthropologist/archaeologist, ranger, trapper/tracker/seasoned hunter, bird watcher, game warden, naturalist, law enforcement), and other explanations can be reasonably excluded.
- Class 3a
- Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.3a Investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility, the observer is credible, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
- Class 3b
- Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.3b Unidentifiable vocalizations were reported and there is accompanying tangible evidence to possibly indicate the presence of a sasquatch/bigfoot, the observer is very reliable, and other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
- Class 3c
- Class 3, Credibility: Sightings or possible wood ape evidence reported by credible witnesses.3c No visual encounter occurred, but physical evidence was found to indicate the presence of a sasquatch/bigfoot (tracks, hair, scat, etc.), the observer is very reliable, and other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Case: 01090004
Class 3aWoman Has Early Morning Sighting on Rural Property
Report Details
Occurrence date: January/2009
Location: Henderson County, TX
Nearby/Vicinity: Chandler
Time / Conditions: 08:00 — 8am,partly cloudy, high 30's to low 40's. Light wind
# of Witnesses: 1
Location: Henderson County, TX
Nearby/Vicinity: Chandler
Time / Conditions: 08:00 — 8am,partly cloudy, high 30's to low 40's. Light wind
# of Witnesses: 1
Witness Account:
I did not witness this. My mom was telling me what she saw. but would not submit a report for fear of feeling stupid and not sure what she saw. They live off of Lake Palestine just across the first set of bridges going out 315 from Chandler, Texas. She was looking out of her kitchen window into a very large field that has cattle and sometimes deer. She was looking for deer out in the field when a group of deer ran into her field of view as if spooked by something. The animals stopped and all looked tword the tree line in the distance. My mom looked and saw what she described as a animal on two legs moving across the field tword the lake running parellel to the wood line. The wood line is several hundred yards from here house. She could not make out a lot of detail, but knew it was not a man. She did not know if it was walking or running just knew it moved faster than a normal human walk. It was in the high 30's that morning and a light wind.
Sounds:
She was inside
